In keeping with the theme of four, we will present the next four years through the four elements: wind, fire, earth and water. Like the four cardinal directions (north, south, east and west), or the four states of matter (gas, liquid, solid and plasma), the four elements allow us an opportunity to frame the coming catastrophe in a way familiar to the ancients. And in so doing, remind us that humans have lived through such times before. If we listen to the land and our collective memory, we will get through this, and might even end up better off for it.
![]() |
You can't have one without the others. |
On the Great Plains of North America, we feel the wind ever-present. It shuffles dirt from here to there. Scatters dry leaves just to mock those foolish enough to think raking them worth their time. When it hits your home at just the right angle, it howls and moans through the rafters, raising hairs on the back of the neck. When the spring air moves thick with dew across the land, the wind brings replenishing rain. But in the dry times, the wind brings more than just desiccation and decay. A strong wind can spread a wildfire 200 feet a minute or more. To rejuvenate the land, nature decrees it first must burn. And woe to those who think they can catch the wind. For those who set the winds loose, never control where they blow. A foul wind surely blows through the land today. It dries the plants and soil. One simply has to walk outside to get a whiff of the acrid smell of smoke on the breeze. And we know what will follow it…
The second half of the year plays out much like the first half. Controversial take, we know. But what do you want from a government led by an infirm old man and gray suits in corporate boardrooms. The ‘anti-illegal immigrant’ raids continue unabated. More families ripped apart, more ‘administrative errors’ dumping US citizens into concentration camps alongside those the administration believes don’t belong here. In this climate of intimidation and fear, big media companies reach merger settlements with the government. Effectively, they pony up a ‘pay to play’ tax; they pay the Feds a regulatory fee and they get to break every anti-trust law and regulation. Those running the big banks would probably shake their heads and wonder what took the media companies so long to figure out how the game is played.
Tariffs continue to get slapped on, then taken off, countries and industries at the dear leader’s whims. Which in effect means people’s taxes fluctuate month to month, or even week to week. All while the power to tax and set budgets is supposed to reside with Congress. The dangers in letting the President raise his own funds from taxes levied without the consent of the governed, sets the country up for the kind of crisis which triggered the English Civil War. To make that very long story way too short, Charles I didn’t want to call a Parliament to raise taxes, so he invented legal fictions for raising taxes on his own. In perhaps the most notorious example, Charles tried to impose ‘ship money’ taxes on English counties which did not, in fact, lie on the coast. That an English county without access to the sea should be expected to pay money to the crown in lieu of building ships for the defense of its non-existent coastline appeared as absurd to 17th century Englishmen as the national-security case being made today.
But back to the present. In modern America, we are told citizens must now pay import taxes on goods from all over the world. Why? Because fentanyl might come from some of those countries, therefore we have a national emergency which requires raising everyone’s taxes. But the money raised won’t go to pay for drug treatment or interdiction. Instead, it will pay for tax cuts for the rich. The important part appears to be that the executive can raise funds without the consent or oversight of Congress.
![]() |
History isn't even trying to be subtle. |
On top of the inconsistent justifications involved, the regime's tax, opps, tariff policy, gets portrayed to the media as cunning and good negotiating. But for most sectors, it has quickly become an excuse to raise prices. Just as supply chain issues in the wake of the Covid pandemic became an excuse to raise prices. Whether or not current price hikes count as greedflation is somewhat in the eye of the beholder, but the effect on prices is not ambiguous; they go up, and don’t come back down.
These higher prices don’t just make households poorer though. They also slow economic activity, dampening demand for goods and services. And when that happens, the rich are content to make less profit, right? Nope. Employers cut back hours, then start firing people. The job market cools off, with fewer openings posted and even fewer actual hirings taking place. This isn’t to say that overall unemployment rises, though. Many people look for work off the books, moving into a gray zone of cash-only employment. Between counting only people unemployed for 6 months and including those actively seeking work, the rate remains relatively low, ticking up only a bit to 5%.
And as this happens, the regime leans hard on the Federal Reserve to drop interest rates by expanding the money supply. This both fuels inflation, mostly in assets, while also pushing the value of the dollar lower. Year to date, the dollar has dropped 9% against a basket of currencies. By the end of the year, the dollar will have dropped another 6% against the standard basket of currencies, ending the year 15% lower.
Importantly, the rising cost of debt service in the bond market begins to attract investment. Money that might have been lent to a small business start up or to a large firm looking to expand domestic production dries up. After all, the government is legally obligated to pay its debts, while for profit businesses can always fail and go bankrupt. Thus, as prices rise and send a potential signal that there’s money to be made producing goods here in the US, many businesses can’t find the capital to make those investments.
And how do the people respond to all this, in the optimistic scenario?
![]() |
"Why boycott? It never changed anything!" - some neo-liberal think piece writer, late 2025. |
Americans respond by NOT doing the thing Americans seem to love the most; they refuse to buy things from companies that collaborate with the regime. This achieves two goals: it hits the bottom lines of companies Americans perceive as directly benefitting from the current regime, and it allows people to re-localize their economies, buying from friends and neighbors. Better than simply ‘voting harder’, boycotts hit corporate bottom lines immediately, and cannot be easily manipulated or meddled with, unlike elections. Initially, finding local substitutes for typical big box slop feels alien and uncomfortable for many, but as the boycotts go on, Americans come to understand what they lost when they traded in the corner store for the franchise. In some corners of the country, people even begin liking interacting with fellow citizens they might have otherwise never met. We know this last bit is a little rosy, but we did promise a positive vision, didn’t we?
On a less cheery note, more Americans find themselves forced to hide undocumented immigrants, green-card holders, and even naturalized citizens. Even as individuals and families find refuges, the reason for this doesn't go away. The streets are not safe for anyone of the wrong skin tone, and, in some instances, for people who speak out against the government. The climactic moment of the year comes in late December. With the election of a self-described democratic socialist and naturalized US citizen as mayor of America’s largest city, the regime feels compelled to act. ICE agents descend on New York City just before Christmas with a mission to arrest the mayor-elect. The city explodes in days of rioting. More ominously, the NYPD fractures, with half of the force supporting the actions of the Feds, and the other half refusing to work with them. In an act of supreme cowardice, the New York state government refuses to intervene or even protest the Federal government’s actions. After days of warrantless searching, thousands of injuries, and a billion dollars of property damage, ICE cannot locate the mayor-elect. On New Year's Eve, he posts a video to social media showing him formally requesting political asylum in Canada.
The regime celebrates by installing the runner-up as mayor. In response, many New York businesses cease withholding Federal taxes from their employees’ paychecks in protest. Strikes and work slowdowns follow. Renegade city utility workers shut off services to Federal buildings across the city. The regime’s actions drew condemnation in the United Nations. In response, the US State Department announces that Canada will be added to this list of state sponsors of terror. The Canadian military is put on high alert in the event of a US incursion, but the regime elects not to test the resolve of their northern neighbor. Instead of invasion, the regime in Washington announces that the US will withdraw from NATO AND the UN the following year.
![]() |
This wasn't the first image that came up when I searched "angry Canada,' but it was the best. |
Next week, we will check in on Marty Jr, Allison, Bobby and Jillian, and see how this timeline treats the kids and grandkids of our protagonists from Inequality by Design, which comes out August 25th in print and e-book. And it's available for pre-order now!